there. Earth changes are described in light text, heavy on the emphasis of glowing times afterwards: peace,
cooperation, the return of Christ, or whatever. If the cataclysms are at all described, they are put into short phrases,
such as "much death", without details. To state which areas of the world will experience tidal waves, which will
quickly drown, which will freeze, which will choke on ash, and the like is too graphic. Readers of light text can
imagine that others will experience something, but not themselves. This leaves the shift and its effect as theoretical, abstract. What has occurred that some sources are now leaning in the direction of addressing the coming times? In
truth, for every source that moves closer to telling the truth, there are others who back away!
The earth changes are pressing in on all consciousness, undeniable, and thus the comfort of denial is increasingly hard
to achieve. Those attuned to other voices have a choice, to shut it all out or listen, and if they chose to stay in contact will have to admit that something is around the corner. Like Scallion, who deals with this pain in this regard and taps
in, or like Cayce, who likewise reported the unpleasant, some will be true channels for the truth. But likewise, some
otherwise true channels will be increasingly flaky, vague, ethereal, and deny any rough times in the near future.
Consider, when listening to these many voices, that a human is relaying this information, and place this in the context
of what you know human behavior to be. How many of your fellows can take really bad news without trying first to
deny it? Consider second that alien groups relaying information to humans may likewise prefer to save the really bad
http://www.zetatalk2.com/awaken/a132.htm[2/5/2012 11:40:11 AM]
ZetaTalk: Sylvia Browne
news until the last minute. We ask only that those looking for the truth consider the ZetaTalk accuracy track record,
which is impressive to the point of standing alone in information received from a source outside of the human vehicle
relaying it. There is no other channel or source with this track record.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/awaken/a132.htm[2/5/2012 11:40:11 AM]
ZetaTalk: Ramtha
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Ramtha
Note: written on Mar 15, 2002
The entity claiming to be Ramtha, speaking through a channel, is widely viewed as a male entity, and for good reason.
This is not via a channel, but from a male associate of the channel, a woman. Why the deception? In the world of
man, it is males who have influence, but females who are allowed broad scope in what they report, in that they are
assumed to be illogical and emotional. This in conjunction with the stage presence and appearance and confidence of
the individual who would be the public front, determined which of the pair would go on stage. The male contactee
determines the content of the Ramtha messages, but the newscaster is a woman claiming to be a channel. This
contactee is arrogant and in contact with Service-to-Self entities as was Tesla. He received information and projections
allowing him to have a substantial track record on predictions, in order for the Ramtha message to gather a large
following, which it did. As with the Service-to-Self aliens giving the original MJ12 group ships, supposedly to allow
them to secure the technology, this was a false promise. MJ12 never secured any technology, as dissecting the ships
energy source or navigation devices caused explosions. But the myths of a technology exchange for access to
American citizens exists today. Thus, Ramtha, after establishing his initial repute, was no longer given information, as
he was considered cutting lose from his bonds by his controllers. Frustrated in increasing his scope, he turned to petty
control games, revealing his true orientation in these later days.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/awaken/a110.htm[2/5/2012 11:40:11 AM]
ZetaTalk: Barbara Marciniak
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Barbara Marciniak
Note: written on Feb 15, 1996
Many channelers purport to be relaying information from the Pleadians, far out of proportion to the Pleadian influence
on Earth at this time. The reason for this choice, among the many channelers who are faking it, is that the Pleadians are
gentle speaking, not blunt, and focus on feel-good messages. It's all rather like the preamble to a sermon, without ever
arriving at the sermon. It's like attending lectures without ever having to take an exam. The Pleadians don't relay
messages that make humans uncomfortable, that's not their chosen role. They're greeters, the nice guys, easing humans
into the concept of an alien presence with pleasantries. Consequently, those who claim to be channeling Pleadians
don't get challenged to prove it, as no one is uncomfortable.
The drawback to the plethora of false channelers is the plethora of inaccuracies that follow. Barbara Marciniak claims
to channel the Pleadians - she doesn't. She claims an ancient civilization lives in Antarctica - none does. She claims
entities called Game Masters create civilizations - they don't. This is not to say that everything she might write would
be a falsehood, it's just that it couldn't be trusted.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/awaken/a48.htm[2/5/2012 11:40:12 AM]
ZetaTalk: Alexander
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Alexander
Note: written on Apr 15, 1996
Channeling in and of itself has an impact on the human allowing themselves to be a channel. They allow themselves to
be used as an instrument, as a violin or piano is used by the conductor and musician to relay a composers work to the
audience. Many hands play the violin or piano, in effect, but all have more control over the process than the instrument
itself, or so it would seem. Yet if the piano is not tuned, it leaves its mark on what the audience hears, and if the violin
can't sustain a rich and resonant sound, the audience misses what the composer intended. The instrument matters.
When reading channeled material, the reader should bear this in mind, and look for the slant that may be there, the
persistent theme that seems out of keeping with the bulk of the content. The work channeled for Alexander carries
such a mark, though the channeler Alexander would say otherwise. If a channeled work seems to be in conflict with
itself, then look to the channel, as perhaps the instrument is flawed.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/awaken/a52.htm[2/5/2012 11:40:12 AM]
ZetaTalk: Sheldon Nidle
Mail this Pageto a Friend.