An employee desperately needing the job will not notice any threatening signs that their performance is under
par, or the company may institute a layoff. Thus, the layoff comes as a shock, when it hits, but at least the
employee is able to work during this time, and thus better his changes if the layoff did not occur. Thus, is it a survival mechanism.
The primitive tribe, in the woods and hunting, gathering nuts or tubers, cannot constantly think about an
impending attack by a carnivore, else would be debilitated and unable to function. Thus, they deny that such an
attack could occur at any moment, bustle about the day, gathering and hunting and cooking, and function. When
the attack by a carnivore occurs, it is a shock, some die but not all, and the tribe regroups. The outcome is hardly
different, except that with denial, they functioned, and if frozen in fear, would die of hunger instead. Thus, denial should not be seen as a weakness so much as a survival mechanism inherent in the human, engaged when
matters become overwhelming.
Just as some humans will go into denial when matters heat up, others will come forth. There are those who are in the
background, mulling over the issues, who will find their voice and courage when the issues become pressing. The hero, emerging.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b96.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:14 PM]
ZetaTalk: Bad News
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Bad News
Note: writen during the August 3, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session
We have stated that the coming times are great opportunities, as life will not be slow and steady, with decisions put off, but the opposite. Many will find themselves in situations where they fear for their own lives, but their neighbors
and family needing a helping hand. Should they stay, and help others, or run? Heroes born or illusions dashed, the
need for action will reveal much. Many have loved ones, or those they feel responsible for or who rely upon them,
which they can either desert or remain in place to care for. Should the husband run for the hill, leaving his crippled
wife? Should he stay and hold her hand, while the waters rise to engulf them, reassuring her that drowning is not
painful or perhaps rocking her in his arms so she cannot see what is coming, or tell himself that her panic does not
matter, being short lived?
Knowing that such horrific times are coming, many move beyond the decision of when to place themselves up for
ridicule, telling their family in no uncertain terms that they take the pending pole shift theory seriously, to who to tell.
Timing of such announcements will resolve itself, as when the planet is increasingly visible, first called a comet or
nova or some such and then called a comet with red outgassing, none will deny that something is approaching. Where it is relatively easy to explain to a healthy father, of a healthy family, in a good location, that he should take his family camping when rotation slows noticeable, and distill their drinking water during the aftertime, what to tell the cancer
patient? What to tell the person who cannot live without insulin, or who can hardly walk much less eat if others do not
bring foot to the table? What to tell those who live in places such as India where escape is not possible, the population held in place by immigration refusal, and lack of options. What to tell those in cities, who have grown soft and have no
idea how food is even grown, much less the skills to feed themselves if out in the wild.
Should one explain the situation fully, or pad the truth with sweet lies or omissions? One can see the different
approaches in channeled works, where the coming times are talked about in kind terms sounding almost like a trip to
the fair. There will be changes, but not to worry, life will be kind and pleasant. The changes are not explained, the dates put off, possibilities of mankind changing matters if they become determined and change their ways - all manner
of smoothing the rough edges of what is to come. Is this helping you? What is the alternative, which we espouse. We tell the truth, and let those affected make their decisions. Those who decide to allow death to overtake them, or who will be in this position in any case, can make their peace, settle their affairs, and enjoy their last days fully, giving emphasis to things that matter like loving one another.
How is this different from the ill patient, who is either told of their likely end time or not? If the doctor and family
lies, they have hope repeatedly dashed, and one day are frantic as they realize the truth. They die, without saying
good-bye as they had hoped, having repeatedly been raised up and dashed down during the process of their disease.
Alternatively, the truth told, they weep, embrace their loved ones, and the last moments are precious, lived fully. We
suggest, therefore, no white lies, no softening the truth, and no avoidance. Those who cannot deal with it, will deny, and are most likely doing this in their lives at present on many fronts. Those who can, will find their peace more
quickly, and in the end thank you for your frankness.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b95.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:15 PM]
ZetaTalk: Certainty
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Certainty
Note: written during the April 20, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
Thus, many cast about for certainty, to assist them in their decisions, which are of great import in their lives. Who can they look to, for answers?
1. The church, which preaches Armageddon, but does not give a date, and states that clinging to the doctrine and
being one of the faithful will save the faithful in a rapture. However, even firm believers feel nervous about this,
though they admit this little.
2. The governments, which will become increasingly tight-lipped as this year passes, doors shut, no comment, and
can be expected only to follow their current line of revelation, which is close to nil.
3. Scientists, who argue among themselves in any case, and deal with contradictions to the current theory by
shouting the contradiction down and refusing to put the contradicting parts together. If they cannot resolve the
arguments about Global Warming, they can hardly be expected to resolve, in 2002, the arguments pro and con a
possible pole shift.
4. Major Media, which may surprise mankind in coming forth with real documentaries and exposés that would lead
the common man to at least consider the possibilities, in the context of discussing "mysteries" or "possibilities"
and having talk shows. But in that major media are owned by few, and tightly controlled in the main, this can
turn either way, occurring or not, depending upon human motives and decisions, being in the hands of man.
Thus, there is only one source of stunningly accurate predictions related to the current changes - ZetaTalk. Having