Выбрать главу

augment the package he represents. In either case, a stronger self image is the answer, as when reaching across

borders, one must have a country to extend a hand from.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b56.htm[2/5/2012 1:28:17 PM]

ZetaTalk: Scapegoats

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Scapegoats

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995

Hatred and scapegoating are rift throughout humanity, and in truth, throughout all intelligent species everywhere. Why

is it that emotions can ramp up and focus, like a laser light, at innocents? What could cause men to deliberately harm

innocent children? Although others can see that the cause is not just, and the victims not guilty, the perpetrators are

sternly convinced they are doing the right thing. What is going on here, and what is going wrong!

In society many emotions must be hidden, and in many families this is learned young. The babe senses that certain

postures get applause, and other postures illicit rage. Does this eliminate the emotion? It does not. These emotions

simply go underground, where they cause many problems as they are not recognized for what they are. What are these

emotions, and why are they unwelcome. In families, cohesive emotions are applauded, and discord is punished. As the

father, or father figure in most cases, is most powerful and dominant, this is the fulcrum where discord is determined.

In short, if the dominant father figure makes a statement or a determination, any challenge to this is deemed discord

and is punished. The frustration this genders, particularly in young boys, is buried, but like fires in the underbrush, the sparks and coals glow with life, waiting to spring up at a later point.

By what logic does a young man, now grown, turn with savagery against innocents simply because decisions in their

youth were arbitrary? This is not a decision made in the heart, as those who scapegoat and form the core of hate

groups are not in touch with their feelings toward others. They are in the process of learning how to suppress feelings

toward others, and moving in the direction, if not already arrived, of the Service-to-Self orientation. What then is the

motive? It is to relieve rage, which cannot be directed toward the actual source, perhaps long dead or at least buried in the subconscious, but in any direction that results in an emotional catharsis. The scapegoat, screaming and bloody or

perhaps pleading for mercy and life, is viewed, at least subconsciously, as the father figure or whomever was dominant

and arbitrary in the past. As the true cause of the rage is in fact not addressed, this catharsis is short lived and yet

another scapegoat is sought.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b16.htm[2/5/2012 1:28:18 PM]

ZetaTalk: Holocaust Denial

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Holocaust Denial

Note: written on May 15, 1997

The many scenes of the holocaust are vivid and compelling, and continue to appear afresh in print, the horror

undiminished over time. The holocaust horrors are likewise well documented, as where millions of neighbors are

dragged off there are likewise millions of neighbors left behind to remember the circumstances. And where numerous

gas chambers and concentration camps have train loads of hollow eyed and stick starved Jews moving toward the gas

chambers and only the smoky smell of death and piles of gold fillings jerked from the teeth of the dead emerging from

the camps, there can scarcely be any doubt as to the activity going on. However, the fact that the holocaust is vivid and well documented is one of the reasons for a holocaust denial.

In short, the more horrible the event, the more guilt one bears toward this or similar situations, the more likely denial will be used to deal with the discomfort the event engenders. Denial of horrific events is so common as to be almost an

everyday event in human lives. The ease with which the conscious mind of humans can sever memories so the mental

pathways are not traveled readily adds to this, as it is a ready route to be taken by those who want to forget or put an

alternate story into place. Those responsible for an accident begin to think that the victim himself caused it, thus

relieving themselves of responsibility. Those responsible for a crime likewise excuse themselves by blaming the

victim.

This tendency is one reason the most heinous crimes, such as the mass rape of a young girl, can be turned around to be

her responsibility. She was flirtatious, and brought it all down upon herself. By this all men who turned an eye toward

a vulnerable girl and pondered having her in a helpless state are relieved of responsibility for the acts that such

thoughts might engender. They tell themselves that they are not the perpetrators, even in their thoughts, as the victim was guilty. Likewise the holocaust is often explained away as something the Jews brought down upon themselves, due

to being financially and professionally successful. Then engendered jealously, so they had it coming to them! If this

does not fly as an excuse, then the holocaust never happened. Those wishing to deny that thoughts can turn into

action, and that they share the thoughts that the perpetrators held, will even cling to the absurd rather than discomfit

themselves.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b73.htm[2/5/2012 1:28:19 PM]

ZetaTalk: Forgiving

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Forgiving

Note: written on Sep 15, 1995

Forgiving someone who has injured one involves two parties - the injured and the perpetrator.

Circumstances may be such that the injury was an accident and the perpetrator horrified and asking what they can do

to make amends. In this case the path to forgiveness is already paved with possibilities, and the injured has but to

specify what is required to make amends and the two parties will begin to heal each other. Circumstances may be such

that the injury was an accident but the perpetrator in denial. Nothing has happened, and even if it did it wasn't their

fault. In this case forgiving the injury must take place on separate paths, with the injured coming to terms with the

accident as just that - an accident. The perpetrator has already forgiven himself, as he wasn't there and there is nothing to forgive. Circumstances may also be such that the injury was deliberate, but was a result of a disagreement, a fight,

and fault lies all around. One was pushed beyond his limits and lashed out. One was steadily tortured until a dark

mood overtook him. In these cases forgiveness usually progresses rapidly, as both parties are clearly cognizant of the