core of the Earth. The magnetic diffusion of today stems from the core of the Earth, and is not in concert with
activity from the Sun.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p67.htm[2/5/2012 9:55:08 AM]
ZetaTalk: Proof Exists
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Proof Exists
Note: written on Apr 15, 1999. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Proof is something that lies before you and has for years. It is not only in the geology of the Earth. If you simply look
to how the government is reacting, you can see a pattern. Of course, for some, who are wishing that it not be so, there
will be no amount of proof. Why does NASA hide what the Hubble sees and fail to give it out? This should all tell you
something, so look to that behavior and ask, why this is occurring. Unless one is looking at a star with a tiny pinpoint
of light, there can be many interpretations for what is seen. Many emanations that come from the sky are only able to
be determined by large observatories, which are so few in number and require such an amount of money to support
them that they inevitably are at the end of some puppet string and can be pulled and controlled. In addition, you have
statements from NASA and JPL that can counter what people may see.
Whatever happened to Planet X that was sighted in 1983? For hundreds of years prior to this, astronomers were
plotting the orbits of the outer planets and stating that there was a perturbation. This caused a flurry of activity going
into the early 1980's, in which there were calculations by Van Flandern and others showing the approximate size of a
planet, an extra planet in the solar system that would account for the perturbations. In fact, he was remarkably close to
the actual size of the 12th Planet which is inbound. They found it. They located it by infrared. There were newspaper
announcements and suddenly not a word was said for a decade. Then NASA explained that tiny differences in weight
of the outer planets explained it all. If this were the case, since the weight of the planets is calculated from the orbits
and the visible sizes, why would all those astronomers for all those centuries be confused and notice the perturbations?
They would have calculated the weight to explain the perturbation to begin with! Of course you're being fooled and
lied to.
The skies are very crowded, with many lights, some moving, some not, and unless you have a relatively stationary star
that is bright and with a pinpoint of light, it is difficult to the average man to say that it's this or it's that. The 12th
Planet, at the distance it is at in 1999, is smaller to the eye than Pluto, which is a speck. In addition, Pluto is reflecting
sunlight, which the 12th Planet cannot as yet because of its distance. Therefore, it does not have the bright appearance
that Pluto does, and is smaller than Pluto. It has a dim red glow, which would almost fade into the background because
there is no bright pin point of light. Therefore you must look at it, focus not for the bright light but for the dim light.
Most of your telescopic equipment is accustomed to filtering out the pin point of light that comes from a star, which is
quite intense in the middle. Therefore you have to gear to a magnitude of 10 to account for the skewing that your
telescope equipment uses to adjust for starlight, and look for something tiny.
Rather than look for a moving object which will surely become visible and traceable the year before the pole shift,
look to the changes in your Earth. The types of Earthquake changes, the types of weather changes, are going to tell you
more truly than anything else what is approaching. Take a look at the Jewish Exodus, and what the Bible and Egyptian
Papyrus tell you occurred prior to that cataclysm - the bugs and frogs seemingly crazed, the droughts and deluges.
These are indications to you as surely as the heating of the oceans from the bottom up and the disbursing magnitude of
the confused core, that something is very, very close. This should alert you, and you will soon enough see something in
the skies.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p104.htm[2/5/2012 9:55:09 AM]
ZetaTalk: Heralding
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Heralding
Note: written prior to July 15, 1995
Changes have already begun, and are known to your scientists and meteorologists. Violent storms, unusual weather
patterns, severe and long lasting droughts, increased frequency of hurricanes, torrential rains, and a general warming of
the planet. This is all cast in the category of Global Warming, yet the cause is not certain. Which of you, as citizens or
even as scientists, could state the cause with certainty? We are telling you that the Earth itself will be warmer, and this
affects weather patterns. Humanity has come to expect predictability in the weather. Even the monsoons of the East, or
the hurricanes that hit the eastern United States, are expected and prepared for, as they are predictable. During the next
few decades, until the Earth settles down into another predictable pattern, mankind will find its greatest problems with
the weather to be its unpredictability.
Weather changes heralding the giant comet's approach will at first be within normal parameters. As long as
meteorologists can find a similar pattern on the books or an old timer can be found to regale us with tales of the old
days, no one will get unduly alarmed. The weather, after all, is a constant source of conversation, but the intensity of
these discussions will change when the effects on food chains relied upon by man move outside of familiar boundaries.
It is at this point that Alarm Bells will go off. All attempts to explain the changes based on Global Warming from the
Greenhouse effect will run into snags as the weather will refuse to be predictable. Areas of the world which have been
deserts throughout mankind's memory will become swamps under constant and repeated rains. Temperate climates
used to periodic gentle rainfall will suffer intractable droughts. Then this will switch about, for no apparent reason. The
reason lies deep within the Earth's core, an area the meteorologists refuse to consider, and thus their predictions on the
atmosphere will never be based on the right parameters.
A key change, to which one could point, is the warming of the Earth's oceans, around the globe. This has been
measured as a 6 inch rise, worldwide, on all the beaches. The waters have risen because they are warmer, and warm
water takes up more room than cold water, as all elementary physics books will report. How is it that the oceans, so
very deep and so very cold, have warmed up? Is it the almost imperceptible rise in the temperature of the air, a degree
or so, as reported to date? Since heat rises, why would this slight rise affect the oceans? Meteorologists will tell you
that the effect of air warming is air turbulence, not warmer oceans. The Oceans are Warmer because the core of the
Earth has heated up, and it does so in response to its brother coming closer. This will continue, and increase, until