the ground is under pressure, exists. Earthquake clouds, showing what cannot be seen in these particle flows, are visually
showing what these animals sense.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta158.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:52 AM]
ZetaTalk: Tunguska Explosion
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Tunguska Explosion
Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.
A source of endless speculation is the wide area of flattened trees, spread outward in a circle, the result of an apparent
explosion that occurred just after the turn of the century in Siberia. No witnesses, radioactivity, or meteor remains
seem to exist as pieces toward solving this puzzle. Nuclear power was not yet in mankind's hands. What occurred? The
Tunguska trees are devastated by an explosion that occurred close to the ground, as evidenced by the butterfly pattern
of trees knocked sideways. It was a huge cloud of well mixed methane and air, equivalent to all the natural gas being
piped about in the US at any given time, and the burn spread around this cloud or that, under and over and around,
until a particular pocket of well mixed methane and air had no where to go with its heat since the burn was all around.
Itself burning, the heat ramped the combustion up to the explosion level.
Methane gas occurs naturally, a result of the decomposition of organic materials. Landfills must vent this or experience
explosions. Some humans know they can light and briefly burn their farts. Humus or accidentally buried organic
material is a source of methane gas, and if not vented, this attempts to rise, being light, and will pool if trapped.
Siberia was once lush, a fact the carcasses of mastodons reveal, as their bellies are full of grass. Flash frozen and
covered with volcanic dust, organic material lies as a potential. Where Siberia may appear to be a frozen wasteland,
the center of the Earth is hot, and decomposition of trapped matter, proceeding slowly but over a long time, can
accumulate a large, trapped pool of methane gas. Released Due to a Shift in the Earth's crust and encountering a raise in temperature sufficient to act as a spark, this would explode, with the size of the explosion in proportion to the
volume of violently venting gas.
The burn was lit by the wick traveling back along the wisp of methane that had been blow up and southwest by the
prevailing westerlies over Siberia. What witnesses saw was the burn off of methane that had disbursed into the air and
was not sandwiched between burning masses so that its heat had nowhere to go, the basis of exploding, rather than
burning, gas bombs. The process was:
1. Methane gas hisses out from under frozen permafrost that had been cracked like a sheet of glass due to earth
stress, pre-shock to the earthquake that was recorded during the Tunguska explosion.
2. Methane gas mixes with the air as it rises, followed by more hissing air, so that a huge cloud of methane has
formed in the atmosphere over Tunguska, equivalent to all the natural gas at any given time in the US.
3. A wick of methane that has drifted upward and southeast, driven by the prevailing westerlies, is sparked due to
the air movement, the same process that causes lighting due to rapid air movement during storms.
4. The lit methane burns rapidly back along the wick, the "meteor" that was seen, lights all the gas that is
encountered but before all but the nearest witnesses can see it, those who died in the explosion, an overburn over
gasses closer to the surface prevents heat from rising and an explosive situation occurs.
The explanation that a meteor exploded above ground is an attempt by the establishment to avoid the methane gas, and
thus the pole shift and shifting crust issue. Comets and meteors do not explode when encountering Earth’s atmosphere.
This is not what your history or science presents to you! If they are monstrous, they plunge to Earth and leave a crater
such as the Gulf of Mexico off Yucatan. If they are tiny, they burn up in the atmosphere as shooting stars. If they are
midsized, they burn on their periphery but land to be rocks picked up and examined by your scientists. The lack of
meteor particles or dust proves that it was not an exploding meteor. Methane, once burned or disbursed into the air,
leaves no trace. Meteors leave traces, methane does not.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s57.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:52 AM]
ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids
Note: written on Jul 15, 1996.
Recently the media and Internet message boards have been alerting the populace to the presence of what is termed
near-miss asteroids. Discussion ensues on how to deflect them should they threaten to impact the Earth, as though
deflection would be possible. Does mankind now have the means to deflect such large, rapidly moving objects? Such a
deflection would require a precisely placed explosive device of sufficient strength to vaporize the asteroid.
Disintegration would be required because deflection is not possible in space. This statement will meet with vehement
objection, especially from the arm of the establishment which seeks only to deflect panic in the populace. It is not a
collision with an asteroid which will shortly devastate Earth, it is the passage of the monster 12th Planet, ever drawing
closer. Nor will deflection of the trash in this giant comet's tail be possible - boulders as large as trucks thumping to
Earth on occasion and the peppering of red dust and gravel. Deflection of these few boulders is not possible either, as
they are shrouded in the swirling dust of the tail, and only visible just before impact.
Deflection of large objects traveling in space or plummeting to Earth must address several problems.
The object is traveling because it is caught in a gravitational attraction. This might not be the case in deep space,
but within the Solar System this is most certainly the case. If an asteroid is heading toward Earth, bumping it to
the side a bit or even temporarily stopping its motion is at best a delaying action. The asteroid will resume its
path, as the factors that influenced the path in the first place are still there.
Attempting to aim the asteroid so it falls in the ocean has the potential for making matters worse, not better.
Unlike the winged space shuttles, which can start their descent path at precise points and behave predictably,
asteroids do not take orders or respond to controls. They are odd shaped, their shape an unknown variable. They
may or may not burn fiercely, a heated air factor that is not known. They may circle or plummet, depending on
their weight and size, more unknown variables. Thus attempting to steer them could prove disastrous. Oops,
dropped it it right on the Pentagon!
A nuclear explosion set off on the surface of an object in space would have minimal effect, as the explosion can
expand in all directions at once. Nuclear explosions on the Earth's surface are an irresistible force meeting an