immovable object - the Earth! Where the explosion can expand up or outward into the atmosphere there is only
air turbulence. The portion of the explosion that is on the land side, or in the case of an underground explosion is
encapsulated, is between a rock and a hot expanding place. The explosion is forced into the rock strata by the
continuously expanding center of the explosion. Solid rock vaporized by nuclear explosions on the Earth's
surface does not equate to the damage that would be done by one or even many nuclear devices on the surface of
an asteroid. All parts of the explosion move rapidly out into space, and thus the asteroid is safely away before
the nuke really gets going. A firecracker. A gnat. A sneeze. And the asteroid proceeds on its way, having only
momentarily stepped aside to avoid mankind's silly experiment.
All the sudden upsurge in talk about the dangers asteroids present, and all the talk in the late 1990's about reviving the
Star Wars program to address this threat is not because something can actually be done. Short of making practical
plans to survive the coming pole shift while hunkered down on the surface of the Earth, mankind has no options, and
those in the establishment who talk up asteroid deflection possibilities know this. They are simply buying themselves
time by pushing the point where panic in the populace gets heated as far out as possible. Hopefully, the panic button
won't be hit until those members of the establishment are safely away in their well stocked enclaves, and then the rest
of humanity, who has been reassured that their government can protect them, be damned.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s74.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s74.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Light Particles
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Light Particles
Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.
In the recent past, humans considered the world around them to be composed of either mass or energy, energy being
anything they could not put their hands around. Only within the past century has the notion that both mass and energy
are solid particles become widely accepted. Energy is just really small stuff, moving fast. Increasingly, the really small
stuff is identified, at least in theory as it is too small to be observed directly. The clues, for humans struggling to
understand the world around them, lies in the behavior of small particles under different circumstances. Light is not
composed of a singular particle, but dozens of particles, thereby accounting for much of what humans call the strange
behavior of light.
Rainbows are caused by the various particles responsible for what humans call color, the color of an object being
determined by which particle is overwhelmingly present in the flood of particles striking the eye. Diffraction of
light in water laden air following a rain storm results in what humans call a rainbow, where the eye perceives
light particles sorted out by the degree, or angle, of diffraction from one side of the rainbow to the other.
Auroras, colorful light displays of waving banners across the northern or southern skies, are caused by the
susceptibility of the various particles to the gravitational pull from the Earth. These light displays are visible to
humans where the glare of sunlight does not drown them out, as the eye registers the overwhelming particle
nature of the light flood, discarding minor particles that might be present as so much noise.
Brilliant sunsets and dawns have been assumed by humans to be caused by dust suspended in the air, when of
course those dust particles are present during the day as well and cause no such color variation. The human eye
receives in the dim light of dawn or dusk an overwhelming flood of light composed of particular particles which
are more prone to bend toward the gravitational pull of the Earth than other particles. Thus the sunset or dawn is
most brilliant at a point just before or after the full glare of sunlight, when the particle flood is strong but is not
mixed in with competing light particles to the point of being drown out.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s90.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds
written Apr 22, 2004 during godlikeproduction.com message board debates on why light bends toward a gravity sink
In trying to understand the behavior of light particles, which are many and not a single particle, humans boggle. They
ascribe the various colors to speed of vibration, the wave pattern high or low, long or short. The breaking of a ray of
sunlight going through a prism into a rainbow of colors is thus ascribed to a change in speed or a modified wave
pattern, as though a sub-atomic particle is forced to compact and squeeze in some invisible tunnel. Does glass have
invisible tunnels they force light rays into, or the ability to hold light particles back so they compress? They speak of
reflection or refraction of light as though it were an object bouncing, which sub-atomic particles do not do unless a
direct repulsion occurs. Are light particles repulsed by the sub-atomic qualities of a silver backed mirror, such that
they bounce? They ascribe the Auroras to an attraction by light particles to electro magnetic particle, such that they
dance, apparently, only at the poles, but balk at giving this attractive quality to gravity. The orange light that floods the
sky at sunrise and sunset is ascribed to dust, of all things, with no explanation of why this spectrum is so affected but
the other spectrums not. The huge size of a light emitting object such as the Sun coming over the horizon, in conflict
with established human explanations, is rejected. If it conflicts with the current establishment line, it did not occur, and
they call anyone saying otherwise deluded.
Why does light reflect from some surfaces, absorb into others, or change color when emerging from a prism? And
what does this have to do with the obvious bending of orange/red light over the surface of the globe, as seen at sunrise
or sunset? Is there a relationship? There is indeed. Some sub-atomic particles, a ready example being the many
particles in the electro-magnetic arena, flow together, are attracted to each other, and are incited to move with each
other by that attachment. Man thinks of electrons as being one sub-atomic particle and has barely considered
magnetism to be a particle flow, yet these particles number in the hundreds, and are not all the same in their behavior.
Light particles, thus, are immense in their numbers, and the various wave forms with resulting color signature
recognized by a retina only one example of the many. Do these light particles like to flow with one another, being
attracted to one another in a similar manner to the electro-magnetic particles? Obviously.