surrounding solar system and thus trying to get closer or farther away, within the confines of the sphere the core finds
itself in. But without arguing these points, the issue in pole shifts is what the weakest link is when the magnetic fields clash.
Is it the orbit position, which might tilt to allow a pole shift to occur simply due to orbit changes? Perturbations in the orbit, due to gravity pull, but not a tilted orbit, per human astrophysics. Would a passing planet draw another closer to
it, temporarily? This argument would not cause a pole shift, but a temporary slowing down or speeding up in the orbit
path, per human astrophysics. It is drag, rotation slowing due to extra man-made lakes around the equator, that silly
argument put forth by humans to explain a barely perceptible slowdown in rotation speed, lately increasing? Drag
would cause a slowed rotation, but not a tilt. Humans, schooled into dead-think in their autocratic schools, have no
way to explain pole shifts without being open minded and exploratory, those attribute that get them punished in their
schools and yelled at by the Shepherds of the Sheep of the sci.astro Usenet. So mention of a pole shift, and its
mechanisms, creates a yawn, not a query, in most.
Indeed, there are many factors that hold a body in its orbit, beyond what human astrophysicists conclude. But to avoid
endless arguments about endless factors, let us simply state that the orbit involves many bodies and forces outside of
the planet itself, and thus is not the weak link. The orbit continues on, and does not tilt. Gravity likewise would not
cause the planet to tilt, but rather draw closer or, if one is given to consider the gravity counterpoint, the Repulsion
Force, to push away and not tilt. Both we and humans agree on these points, but for different reasons. But what holds
the core of the Earth so firmly that it cannot move in its molten mush, during the passage of another planet with a
magnetic field? This can move, without affecting the orbit or the relative position to other bodies re gravity factors,
and it does move. Place two magnets end to end, and they are happy to line up. Place two magnets side by side, and
they both try to move so that they line up. Make one of these magnets several times the mass of the other, and the
larger dominates in this motion. Thus, the Earth moves, in place, in its orbit, at the point where the passage itself
occurs, the north pole of the passing planet no longer approaching the south pole of the Earth, but passing it, thus
dragging this south pole along with its north pole during the passage.
Thus, you have wandering poles, magnetic fields pointing in all directions in frozen lava, crust shifting to bring
mastodons into the polar circle with green grass in their stomachs, flash frozen to be discovered and pondered over by
modern man. And thus, during this close approach of this very magnetic planet that is heading toward Earth from the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s104.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:19 AM]
ZetaTalk: Weakest Link
south now, you have a swirling core heating the Earth up from the core upwards, causing polar and glacial melt which
cannot be explained by any increase in atmospheric temperatures, and magnetic diffusion which is estimated by
humans to eliminate the Earth's magnetic field in 1,250 years at the current rate. Of course, they are wrong in their
estimate but at least are honest enough to acknowledge that diffusion is occurring. The approaching passage, and its
effect on the Earth, explains these phenomena, where the Shepherds of the Sheep of sci.astro have no such explanation
save the laughable.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s104.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:19 AM]
ZetaTalk: Close Pass
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Close Pass
Note: written on Jan 15, 2001. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
This pole shift is a particularly severe one, but the 12th Planet will come no closer than 14 million miles to the Earth.
There have been worse pole shifts in the past, but not by much. These kind of pole shifts, as this one, cause the Earth
to attempt an almost 180 degree shift. However, the crust does not really succeed in going that distance, because the
core separates from the crust as it rips the 180, so the crust only makes it about a quarter turn, a 90 degree shift. This
particular pole shift will cause a dramatic shortening of the Pacific, a dramatic widening of the Atlantic, and was
known for some time to be one of the more severe pole shifts, which is why the Transformation was scheduled at this
time.
If the 12th Planet were twice the distance away, 28 million miles rather than 14 million miles, the effect would be
diminished by 73%, and the core would attempt to turn with less ferocity, and would only make it approximately 32
degrees, dragging the crust that 32 degrees because the rate of turn would be slower. If the 12th Planet were to be 52
millions miles from Earth, rather than 28, the effect would be so mild as to be considered an adjustment to the current
poles, with a number of volcanoes exploding and high tides to height of perhaps 100 feet high in places on Earth, but
many places on Earth would be almost unaware that a lurching occurrence had happened. They would be considered
mild earthquakes in most places on Earth.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s103.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:19 AM]
ZetaTalk: Magnetic/Geographic
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Magnetic/Geographic
Note: written on Jul 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Why do the magnetic and geographic poles differ, and as the Earth's geographic poles causes the magnetic poles to
wobble about, does this not indicate that the Earth's magnetism is intrinsic only to the Earth? This is not the case. Does
not the runner, going in a straight path, to his way of thinking, heave to the right and then to the left. Take the speed
skater, who swings wildly to the right and left, for balance, but is indeed going in a straight direction. Would you
explain to someone watching the skater that they should determine the direction based on the wild swinging, when it is
obvious that the direction is constant? Does not the direction equal the sum of the parts? Is not the balance, the center
point, what counts? The issue of interest here is not the Earth's wobble, but that the geographic and magnetic poles
differ. Why would this be, especially as the difference causes a wobble in the magnetic allegiance with the Universe?
After a pole shift the Earth's rotation begins again, just as soon as the bully 12th Planet leaves the scene, which is
within days. The core of the Earth, having been confused by the 12th Planet, swirls about finding its magnetic
moorings again. The crust of the Earth by now has stopped its slide, and again connects, gravitationally, to the greater
Solar System in the attraction/repulsion dance that planets perpetually go through. The other planets in the Solar