Выбрать главу

many mites there are in a speck of dust. Mites are everywhere, and should one have the guts to count, the number of

mites in the room would be vastly greater than the number of silverfish or cockroaches. And, of course, the number of

bugs in the room vastly outweighs the number of humans. Such is the situation in the Universe. Man saw the planets,

e.g. humans in the room, and registered their personalities. This happened early on. Then man become aware of the

energy that composes the solar wind, and light rays that come from distant galaxies, e.g. visible bugs in the room, and

registered their personalities. This happened recently. However, humans are not yet aware of the galactic tiny stuff,

e.g. mites, and thus don't have a very important piece of the puzzle in place.

Before humans became aware of the planets, and their relationship to the Sun, there were all kinds of strange

explanations for their motions. Since the Flat Earth Society is still among you, we need not go into detail. Before

humans became aware of the energy paths in the galaxy, there also were all kind of strange explanations for what

seemed to be the erratic nature of the greater Universe, which bobbled and glowed and winked, behavior which was

most often ascribed to the gods or one's own misbehavior. Now scientists are dealing with the larger, visible planets

behaving toward one another like something else is there. You can assume this to be a massive amount of tiny matter.

The stuff the Universe is made of, elemental particles that are not moving, are not clumping, and thus do not form

mass or register as energy.

Nothing to get excited about. Just calculate its weight, and think of it as galactic air - something to pass through.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s14.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:39 AM]

ZetaTalk: Space/Time Curves

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Space/Time Curves

Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.

Regarding the amusing human notion that space/time curves. This theory gained credence recently as humans have

been able to track cosmological events more closely with the Hubble, and noted that the perimeter of an explosion

curved slightly as the event progressed. Do you imagine that light rays are immune to gravitational influences? They

are formed of particles, just as what you call matter is, and as such as subject to the same influences. We have stated

that the Auroras, which are visible light shows and not at all related to magnetic fields, are caused by the bending of

light subjected to the Earth's gravity. This would be visible elsewhere around the globe, but except in the dim light

near the poles does not stand out. Why would particles move in a curve?

Humans should keep in mind that what they see of the Universe reflects

the original situation, such as a nova, that caused the light to escape and move in the direction of Earth.

the direction those light particles were pulled in, by gravitational influences

What humans on Earth do not see is

light that was not moving in a straight line path toward Earth, to begin with

light that was pulled so that it was no longer in a straight-line path toward Earth

Your human scientists are aware of this, identifying places in space where no light seems to escape as black holes.

Nevertheless, as curving space/time seemed like such an interesting possibility among those hoping to always prolong

their stay at the trough the taxpayers are obliged to fill, NASA talked it up. They know better but don't want the

paychecks to stop.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s89.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:40 AM]

ZetaTalk: Gravity

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Gravity

Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.

Humans think that gravity is a simple, singular force, but gravity has many aspects and varies depending on the

composition of the objects in question and their distance from each other.

Gravity differs between objects of different compositions. Like compositions attract each other more, due to the

compatibility of their makeup. They have no extraneous dramas to resolve. Metals figure heavily in this, no pun

intended, as a magnetic component enters into the equation. Where there is flexibility for the objects to turn, one or

both will maneuver such that they are magnetically aligned. This takes time, however slight, and thus an iron ball may

appear to fall more slowly in a vacuum than an object of comparable weight that has but a slight magnetic retention.

Organic compounds also react to gravity in a different manner than in-organic compounds, and this is due to the

complex bonding between the atoms. Bonding involves tying up the electrons, which are used as glue in that they are

shared by more than one atom. Thus, organic material in general will not experience the interference that matter with

free electrons does during a gravity attraction. Inorganic material in essence takes time out to shed or take on electrons,

slowing its movement.

In general, the heavier an object, the greater the gravity force generated within it for another object. The gravity force

is more than compounded, equivocally, but this fact is lost by those viewing the drama because most of the drama takes

place within the object itself. Why would this not be the case? Why would matter only reach out to matter not

contiguous, with its attraction, and not matter near at hand? Some call this internal gravity compression, but this is

merely gravity working to pull each atom toward the greater bulk, which in the case of an orb, like a Sun or planet, is

generally toward the center. As the force of gravity reaches in all directions, the larger or heavier object is emitting

more of a come-on than a smaller or lighter object. When several objects are involved in giving each other the come-

on, the contention causes all of the bodies to dither, but an equilibrium is established in accordance with the mass and

composition of the objects and their distance from each other. Humans find their understanding of gravity to be

incomplete because they are not taking into consideration the repulsion force that large bodies, such as planets,

generate toward each other.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s55.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:40 AM]

ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices

Note: written on Aug 15, 1996.

The advent of the space age and the increasing number of UFO sightings have generated intense curiosity about space

travel in human scientists. Some cling to the notion that all travel within or against a gravity field must be by

propulsion, clinging to known and familiar theories - airplanes lifting off the ground and running parallel as long as the