proceed with this trumpeted announcement requires that they be lulled to the point where the world would be looking.
Thus, they saw Venus dropping on the horizon, moving into position, to their amazement, a gift, an unexpected
surprise. Had it not moved into position as it did, they would have proceeding anyway, allowing all photographers and
viewers to assume they had been faulty. SOHO was prepared ahead of time with doctored images, not a difficult feat for them as the backdrop is predictable, and current Sun flares on C2 and C3 an image simplicity no more difficult than
creating a spray of light from a hidden source. Thus, when Venus appeared to be moving into position, the SOHO
doctors got Confused as to which set to use in the last minute excitement, and they faltered.
We would ask the public if the Moon's orbit, wildly out of position at times during the tilting and leaning the Earth does during the sweeps, has been in the news? Does the fact that the news fails to notice mean it did not happen? The
Second Sun, astonishing those who have seen it, getting no explanation whatsoever. The Sun’s arc high, the entire
Ecliptic off by several degrees, and GoTo scopes not being able to track as expected, all ignored. The tack the
establishment takes is to ignore what they cannot explain, to explain with great fanfare what they want the public to
believe, and rely on the psychology so aptly portrayed in the child’s tale, the Emperor’s New Clothes. Thus, whether
Venus appeared or not, the establishment would proceed with the script, doctored photos long in hand, doctored SOHO
lined up at the gate. Did Venus transit? What does the word ‘transit’ mean? It means a concluded and completed
passage, in one side, entirely out the other, and nothing half way about it.
Venus went half way, and is not proceeding past the Sun on its orbit. How do we know? We and others pushed it
there, into position despite its reluctance, and properly so as to be viewed from Earth. But why? Because we wanted
the public to see it, wanted the observation of other anomalies around the Sun to become the buzz of amateurs. Like the
Moon off orbit, and the Second Sun dramatically confusing those viewing it with the real Sun they see moments later,
this phenomena will not go away, nor will the attention it gains diminish because the establishment ignores it. The tail
of Planet X, the moon swirls, the increasing fireballs streaking through the atmosphere, all are here to stay while the
situation only worsens. Those with scopes and solar filters, seeing what puzzled them on June 8, will go back for
another peek. How could there be those objects around the Sun, getting no mention from NASA? The SOHO images
are light frequency screened so not all comes through, but amateur equipment sees the larger picture. One more nail in
the coffin wherein the credibility of NASA will be buried.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta110.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:03 AM]
ZetaTalk: Bait and Switch
Uh, what am I looking at? Clouds that move back and forth?
The speck at the top has maintained its distance from venus, and is going clockwise around it...is that
Venus´ moon? Does Venus even have a moon? Thatś cool.
There are three anomalous objects in this one.
One at 11 o clock
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta110.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:03 AM]
ZetaTalk: Bait and Switch
One at 2 o clock
One at 7 o clock
Itś northeast of the sun now, I´d say 3 o’clock. Small round object with an aura it looks like. It looks
really odd, anyone have an idea on what it is?
I see two objects and they are moving!
There are about six of those things positioned all around the Sun.
I save the pictures, and then changed them to reflect like a negative, and there is indeed something there
(the one at the 7 o’clock position is very odd shaped, reminds me of the asteroid that one of the news sites
had pictured), and it does seem to have moved.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta110.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:03 AM]
ZetaTalk: Venus and Mars
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Venus and Mars
written Feb 27, 2004
Whether the Earth has halted or reversed in her orbit is difficult to determine. There is strong evidence of Rising Up or
Down in the Ecliptic, as many note the sun too high or low in the sky. Tilts are also easily determined, due to a different arch in the sky painted by the Sun, different rising and setting points for the Sun, and weather and Cold
Patterns. Sweeping arms push the Earth forward, so a reversed orbit is not in pace with the normal forward movement.
Thus a reverse orbit is a stalled orbit, in essence. Where the clocks would place the point where man could look out
into the midnight sky too close to dawn for a February 2004 clock on a globe in a November-December 2003 position,
the ever increasing slowing of rotation counters and confuses this. Thus, the constellations would look, if not precise,
at least similar to what man expects from his February skies.
Drop the Earth in her Ecliptic so the northern hemisphere gets more sun and warmth, confusing the trend with Spring.
Calculate the Earth more in a December posture, with a dropped Ecliptic increasing the day length masking the
differences between Almanacs and any time published by the Navy. Pull the Earth in toward the Sun, a Warning and
prediction given by both an ancient astronomy chart and a recent crop circle, and as evidenced by the blazing sun and
early spring on a northern hemisphere too long above the sun in a raised ecliptic, and therefore very cold. This also
increases the repulsion force issues for both Earth and Venus. Thus, the weather and length of day would look, if not
precise, at least similar to what man expects from a February date.
Venus
Venus, directly in the path where Planet X is moving between the Earth and
Sun, is also affected by its approach. And why would it not, as both Earth and
Venus were approaching Planet X on Dec 25 as it rose in front of them, just in
from Orion and finally reaching the inner solar system. Venus is as large as
Earth, and more directly in the path of Planet X, though its size will keep it
from a collision as it is large enough to invoke the Repulsion Force. This same
Repulsion Force is retarding Venus in its orbit now. Conjunctions of a crescent
Moon and Venus are frequently and popular, the last on Feb 23, 2004 preceded
by one on Dec 25, 2003 and before that, Nov 25, 2003, with slight
displacement of the arrangement between these heavenly bodies. Thus, when
viewers saw the conjunction on Feb 23, 2004 approximately where they
anticipated, this was taken to be an affirmation that the Earth’s orbit was