matter, the planets and rings and oceans, that mankind can see, are slung faster from the waist of a rotating sun or
planet than at the poles, a matter of momentum But it is not the sling that keeps them at the waist, as a sling alone
would not keep them nicely in place, a ring around the waist. There is a return of some type, with the return coming
back into the rotating sun or planet at the poles, and then flowing in the direction of the waist, to fill the gap caused by
the sling. This is not caused by the flow of gravity particles, as the flow of gravity particles is even. Does an object
weigh more at the poles than at the equator? Nor is this the flow of magnetic particles, as the rings around Saturn and
the planets in the ecliptic assume their position regardless of magnetic properties.
The solar wind is not visible to man, yet its effect on comet tails is quite visible. Likewise, the flow of these particles,
unknown to mankind, which force the planets into the ecliptic plane, can be inferred from the fact that the ecliptic
exists, alone. The probes, propelled beyond the grip of the Sun’s gravitational field to where their momentum can
counteract this draw, were expected to float along at a predictable rate, yet are doing so more slowly. The answer lies
in the wash back of the particle flows that keep the planets bobbling in the ecliptic plane and the rings of Saturn so
neatly in a thin line. Just as the fatter oceans around Earth’s equator flow toward the poles, thence wrapping around in
deep ocean current back toward the equator, this particle flow is not even in the pressure it exerts. There is pressure
from the side as well as back toward the rotating sun or planet that is the gravitational giant holding the bobbling
matter in its grip. The closer the bobbling matter is to the equator of a rotating object, the more pressure there is from
the side, pushing the matter into the ring or ecliptic plane.
The probes were in part sent out to explore the planets in the solar system, and were directed by their jets or a
gravitational sling around the planets being visited during their voyage. Thus, the force of gravity from the Sun alone
was not the single force influencing the probes until they floated to where they are today. They now, presumably, have
only their momentum and the gravity pull from the Sun as factors in their pace. Add to this the factor of a returning
particle flow, pushing outward at the ecliptic but immediately upon leaving the ecliptic plane flowing back toward the
Sun. As the particle flow leaves the ecliptic, it is flowing toward the side, away from the ecliptic, but in the backward trip, it is buffeting from the other side, as the currents of this flow become circular around the ecliptic close in, as well
as circular in broad circles that extent to the poles of the Sun. This buffeting from the side affects the rate of escape in
the probes, as they are making side trips, this way and that, however infinitesimal, and this likewise takes time. How
would it not? If a man walks in a forward motion only, he will arrive faster than another who takes the time to dance
to the side, this way or that, now and then.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s108.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:15 AM]
ZetaTalk: Orbital Plane
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Orbital Plane
Note: written on Apr 15, 1996.
Planets orbiting a sun invariably line up into an orbital plane, looking a bit, if one were to speed up the process, like a
flying saucer. Why would this be so, and is there a relationship to the shape that solar systems take and the familiar
shape of our ships? There is indeed a relationship, as what is termed the flying saucer is shaped to simulate the gravity
dynamics of a solar system so that it can become its own little solar system when instigating its own gravity field. A
flying saucer in motion can turn sideways or upside down, and the passengers are unaffected. They are, gravity-wise,
in their own little world. Solar systems do not take this shape by accident, though there is no comparable effect on
Earth for man to study and point to. Gaseous planets, such as Saturn, have rings in a plane, but nothing orbiting the
Earth, man-made or otherwise, is so affected.
The planets are lined up in a plane not because of anything inherent in themselves, but because of a drama that is
taking place in their sun. All suns, being hot and therefore liquid or vaporous in the main, rotate, and do so for the
same reasons that the Earth rotates - parts of the core are seeking to escape this or that side of the Universe, and due to
the motion of rotation that this escape attempt initiates, these same parts find themselves back where they started from,
not having any brakes as it were in a liquid or vaporous environment. The Sun's influence on its planets is more than
light, more than the solar wind in all its components, more than the magnetic field it generates which reaches out
beyond the planets. The Sun's rotation reflects the influences on it, those parts of the Universe that exert a gravitational pull or a magnetic clash, or if there are other large bodies close enough, a repulsion force.
A sun's rotation does not just happen, it begins due to attraction or repulsion. This is what begins the motion. A sun's rotation reflects this, and whatever rotation institutes within the sun has a dominant effect on the planets that are about
the sun. Why do the planets not orbit in all directions? Logically, if there were no enforcement, it would be chance, yet
it seems instead to be the rule. A sun's rotation indicates where the dominant forces are on the sun, and these dominant
forces effect more than the sun. They rule the planets too, pulling and pushing on them, as well. But beyond these
outside influences, the rotation of a sun has an effect on her planets, as the streams within her core, being uneven in
their composition, pull and push on the planets as they may be susceptible to these forces. Thus, coalescing planets
may not start out all in a line, but as they are pushed and pulled they tend to move as far or as near as they can get, and in the end, are in a line with the sun's moving parts, as this is where far and near lie.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s64.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:16 AM]
ZetaTalk: Binary Orbits
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Binary Orbits
Note: written on Nov 15, 1995.
How often do planets, such as your Sun's 12th Planet, take up an orbit around two suns rather than remaining
dedicated to one sun. Rarely, as this requires the wanderer to be large enough that a strong repulsion force develops
when it approaches one of the suns and to also have congealed after a big bang in such a position between the two
suns that this binary orbit ensues. If close to one sun it will settle into the normal orbit around this single sun. But if