Perturbations are known to man as they can observe and record the actions of two planets passing each other in
their orbits. The smaller one will speed up upon approach to the larger, due to the gravity tug between the two,
and after passing will slow down in a comparable manner, lingering as it were. The larger planet has also been
perturbed, and however slightly has slowed to meet the approaching smaller planet and likewise will try to tag
along with the exiting smaller planet. If neither planet were in motion, it could be argued that the speed of the
orbits should net out so they are returned to the same point. Both planet orbits have also altered in their shapes,
but as this challenges the first human notion it is never addressed.
There are several problems for humans here, none of which are addressed due to the discomfort factor. While the
larger planet is slowing to pull toward the smaller planet, on its approach, the smaller planet finds the larger coming to
meet it and increases its speed toward the larger somewhat due to this. The point of passage is not equidistant in the perturbation swath, it is placed toward the early part of the drama, due to this, with the rush to meet being quicker and
taking place in a shorter period of time than the lingering exiting phase. Since the two planets are traveling in the same
direction, they spend more time together during the exiting phase than the approach.
If either the larger or smaller planet were standing still, the human argument that the speed of orbit is compensated
upon approach and exit might be valid, but as they are both moving, the perturbation is not equal on both sides. Net -
the smaller planet should be slowed overall in its orbital speed, as it has the larger planet in close proximity behind it for a longer period of time. This is due to the larger planet tagging along behind the smaller planet. Net - the larger
planet should be sped up overall in its orbital speed, as it is being encouraged to chase the smaller planet now ahead of it for a longer period of time. This should be intuitively obvious to humans, who find the car slows more, overall, the
longer the brakes are applied. To state that the length of time is irrelevant would be absurd.
More than the speed of the orbit is affected when orbiting planets perturb each other, the shape of the orbits is also
affected. Given a smaller planet passing on an inside track and orbiting at a faster speed, the smaller planet will pull
outward toward the larger during passage. Thus, its orbit has been changed, as for a period of time it is tracking along
in a wider curve, at a greater distance from its sun. According to the human explanation for orbits - that they represent
an equilibrium between the planets forward motion and the gravity tug from the sun such that the forward motion has
been bent into a curve, and that the equilibrium is maintained by centrifugal force caused by the continuing tug of the
forward motion - this new orbit shape should be maintainable with no need for the planet to return to its pre-
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s83.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:17 AM]
ZetaTalk: Perturbations
perturbation state.
We have asserted that the equilibrium of orbits is maintained by a combination of not only the gravity tug from the sun
but also by the repulsion force that has been generated between the planet and its sun, and the planets being swept
ahead of rotating energy fields thrown out from the sun like long sweeping arms. That the perturbed planets return to
their pre-perturbation state is in line with our explanation, not the human explanation for orbits. Nevertheless, our
explanation is called wacky and the dictates of the gods of science whom childish humans cling to in their desperate
need for security in an uncertain world once again perpetuate the Dark Ages of Astronomy, which are with mankind
still.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s83.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:17 AM]
ZetaTalk: Centrifugal Force
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Centrifugal Force
Note: written on Jan 15, 1997.
Motion is not a thing, immutable, unchangeable, eternal, once born at the start, as during a big bang or whatever, never
to go away. Motion is not a thing, it is a result, a reaction, and as such it changes. Human astronomers explain orbits
as a balance between a straight line motion tangental to the sun and a gravity tug to the side, and assume that the
forward motion is translated into a centrifugal force that never erodes as it is a thing. This looks good on paper, but
examine the reality a bit closer and the contradictions and inadequacy of that argument emerge.
Each time an orbiting object corrects its straight line path due to gravity tug, its straight line path would be diminished
in its intensity. Is this not the case in your all-too-familiar situation of having to put on the brakes when driving? The
car is in motion along a flat plane, propelled continuously only as long as the foot is on the gas pedal. This equates to
the forward or tangential motion of the planet. Should one brake simultaneously while still stepping on the gas, the car
slows. This equates to the interference in the orbiting planet's tangential motion caused by gravity. Now take the foot
off the pedal, and you do not have the same forward motion as before. It was not a thing, but a reaction, and now it is a reaction to the push caused by the foot on the gas while starting from the car's state of rest.
Just so, the orbiting planet requires a continual push, from something, in order to continue to move. Left without this
push, the object would steadily spiral into the sun, and humans would scarcely have had time to evolve into intelligent
creatures pondering this scenario as the spiral would not take all that long! This spiral is what happens to your Earth
orbiting satellites, which are often kept aloft only due to a puff now and then from the jets built into them. Left alone,
they spiral to Earth, the gravity tug affecting their forward motion each instant. The gravity tug is not strictly a
sideways tug, as in all cases the planet's path is pointed away from the sun, however slightly. For any given instant
moment:
1. draw a line representing the planet's straight line path,
2. draw a second line representing the path the planet is being set upon by the gravity tug, essentially a second
tangent to the sun,
3. the angle between these two lines is the degree of backward tug that the planet is experiencing.
Thus, there is erosion in the forward motion, which is not a thing but a reaction. In order to keep the planet
continuously revolving, there must be a push, and a push there is. It is caused by the swirling matter in the sun's core, which creates fields of influence such as magnetic fields that affect the orbiting planets to varying degrees depending
upon their composition. Why do you suppose that planets orbit all in the same direction? Is it by accident that this