ZetaTalk: Contradictions
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Contradictions
Note: written on Mar 15, 1996.
The long elliptical orbit stands in contradiction to human trajectory theories, which have a trajectory curve downward
mirroring the trajectory curve upward. Repeating comets are going in an essentially straight line away from the Sun, a
line parallel and very close to the one that would be drawn from the very center of the Sun. Human theories of such
trajectories on Earth state that an object going in an essentially straight upward path returns from the same place,
plunging straight downward with a curvature mirroring its upward path. In contradiction to this explanation,
complacent humans find nothing strange when comets reenter the Solar System at a great distance from where they
left. The explanations given by humans for this contradiction in their logic is the Magical Ellipse explanation. The
ellipse needs no explanation, it just is. When asked to describe the forces that control an elliptical path, humans proffer
a technical description of an ellipse. They describe it, not explain it.
The long elliptical orbit stands in contradiction to human gravitational theories, which has the gravitational tug rapidly
diminishing with distance. Where the temporary orbit around the Sun has an explanation in the steady gravity tug from
the Sun, this same explanation is given for the curve they claim is instituted by the repeating comet at a great distance.
Essentially, humans refuse to even address this contradiction, falling again into the Magical Ellipse explanation. Their
response, like the cat which falls to licking itself when it is discombobulated, is to proffer greater and greater detail on
the math they use to draw or describe an ellipse.
Comets, whether termed repeating or non-repeating by humans, assume, however temporarily, an orbit around the Sun.
In this they are going the fastest when going into this curve, and are going slower when they leave off from the Sun.
This behavior stands in direct contradiction to the favorite explanation of why comets leave the Solar System
where and when they do - escape velocity, which is slower when the comet escapes than when it apparently gets
caught. This was a recently learned fact that mankind has yet to deal with. The atmosphere reduces man's ability
to see details close to the Sun, as the Sun's rays scatter in the atmosphere, creating confusion. Likewise distance,
when the comet is on the dark side of the Earth, cannot be measured accurately when the comet is pulling away.
It is the drama when comet's go round the Sun, are spanning the sky when one is looking at them during the day,
that one can measure speed. When one is measuring speed during the night, one is seeing the backside of a
comet, and measurements of speed cannot be accurately determined. It is the recent ability of probes and the
Hubble to get above the atmosphere that allows mankind a clearer picture. In particular, that time span when the
comet is changing its brief orbit to a break-away. The comet slows before it breaks away, in direct contradiction
to man's math.
Likewise perturbations by other planets do not explain why the comet leaves off where it does, and even such a
well known comet as Haley's regularly leaves off from the same spot in spite of vastly different planetary
alignments each time. Human astrophysics doesn't even attempt to address this, as it causes too much
discomfort, apparently. The favorite tactic when faced with this contradiction is to carve up the comet's path into
tiny slices, and focus just on the point where the comet leaves off, and then insert a magical and unnamed
something that perturbs the comet so that it can escape.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s60.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Newton
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Newton
Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.
For a tiny object, such as a climber falling from a cliff, there is not the distance from the Earth to create a situation of
equality in the updraft and downdraft of gravity particles. Satellites are placed at a distance by your astrophysicists in
order to have them behave in accordance with Newton and sustain their distance, supposedly based on velocity? What
Newton has included in his math, without knowing, is the balance of updraft and downdraft of gravity particles. In
point of fact, if an object was not at the distance to create this balance, it either plummets to the gravitational giant or is subject to attraction by another passing or nearby gravity giant. Thus, those orbiting objects you examine are there to
be examined because of the updraft and downdraft balance. Thus Newton and his followers negated the influence of
gravity particles in his orbit equations, as all they saw seemed to fit!
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s118.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:23 AM]
ZetaTalk: Absolute Properties
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Absolute Properties
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Absolute properties, such as the mathematical zero, a figment mathematicians use to make their formulas work, do not
exist. The absolute vacuum is a figment of physicists, struggling to make their formulas work. By this we mean that
absolute properties do not exist in the physical world. The physical world has at any given point more or less mass,
degrees, but never nothing. Absolute zero, the theoretic temperature where all molecular motion stops, also never
happens. In all this neither the mathematicians or physicists are correct, and any formulas that require such factors are
inherently incorrect.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s18.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:24 AM]
ZetaTalk: Mathematical Proofs
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Mathematical Proofs
Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.
Humans have a catchy phrase regarding relationships - which came first, the chicken or the egg? Well, of course it was
the chicken, who gradually evolved to encase young in a shell long before it evolved to become a chicken. First came
dropping the young into a water bed, as fish and frogs do, so the chicken's precursor came first. Humans treat
mathematics much this way, expecting the world to line up with their math when the math evolved to describe their
world. Starting with simple counting schemes, mathematical descriptions became more and more elaborate as they
were endlessly adjusted until they described yet another aspect of nature. When math is used as a tool, and its origins
understood, then when a particular model placed upon a natural phenomena does not fit there is no conflict. The
mathematical model is understood to be the problem. However, just as there is confusion about the chicken or the egg,