most humans lose sight of what came first. They insist the math is sacred, and stubbornly refuse to deal with the
discrepancies this approach produces.
Mathematics, for some, has become a religion.
Mathematics builds upon itself, so that concepts put into place are continued and never discarded. Formulas that
reasonably describe a situation when measurements are crude are never discarded, but are held up as standards to be
disproved and defended. Creativity in math is nil, so that brilliant insights such as Einstein’s are held to ridicule rather
than discussed. Thus it is that mathematics are burdened with the absurd as well as the insightful, and thus regularly
miss the mark. The Zetas are frequently asked what is wrong with human math, or how to do it right. Frankly, the right math will not be discussed, as this might put mankind on paths they are not yet to trod. As to what is wrong, we would
suggest a simple exercise. Face problems with a completely fresh mind, and ploy the math you think would solve that.
Compare what you have placed on paper with the traditional math. What differs? What about the traditional math
forced it into the tradition? We predict you will find that a long history of being passed forward, regardless of worth,
has placed certain formulas into mankind's mathematical view of the world. Would you allow yourself to be treated as
the doctors of yore treated patients, by bleeding and starving or opening the head? Are women in labor to die
screaming rather than undergo cesarean? Are doctor's not to wash their hands because infection spontaneously
generates and germs do not exist?
Mathematical proofs are not "proof". Mathematical proofs only demonstrate that the numbers resulting can be lined up with each other. In fact, this can be assured if one just ensures that the component pieces, in the formulas, are all from
the same grab bag. In other words, if one is building a toy city with lego building blocks, one can get everything to
line up if all the lego blocks are of a similar size or multiples of this size. To make this all line up, just throw out
anything that doesn't fit. This is, in fact, what humans do with their mathematical "proofs". When something doesn't fit, they substitute another lego piece, one from the proper grab bag, and then get smug. They haven't proved anything.
They've only gotten their math to line up, and they're not so good at that either. Contradictions are running side by side at the major universities, with the students asked not to question so the professors can continue to be smug. Just pay
your tuition and shut up.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s54.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:24 AM]
ZetaTalk: Vectors
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Vectors
Note: written on Jul 15, 1996.
Humans place too much importance in what they call velocity vectors, which are only a mathematical representation.
The motion of asteroids or comets or planets is there for a reason. It is not, as humans frequently assume, because the
motion was set in place for some reason long ago and things just follow. The motion does not rule! The motion is a
result, not a primary force. Humans treat motion as though it stood alone, outside of all other factors. What caused the
motion? All motion is a result, from the acorn dropping from a tree, or the wind swaying branches as air masses move
to equalize, to the motion of the planets in their orbits.
The breeze that bows a young sapling over a bit will not keep that sapling bent when the breeze stops blowing. Just so,
an object may even be stopped in its course, but only for a moment. Then on it comes, impelled by the same factors
that impelled it in the first place, as its motion was determined by the gravity pull of objects nearby, and those objects have not moved! An object will be motionless in space for one of two reasons. An object in the absence of gravity
from outside influences has no reason to move at all, and is still only because there is no call to do otherwise. It does
not have inertia, or a reluctance to move. Objects have inertia when they are caught in the grip of a gravity influence,
and most often in the grip of several gravity influences. Therefore, when undertaking the study of motion, limiting the
examination to the object and its speed is only effective when all other factors hold steady.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s76.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:25 AM]
ZetaTalk: Quantum Mechanics
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Quantum Mechanics
Note: written on Aug 15, 1996.
Hand in hand with the realization that atoms were formed of particles of different natures - subatomic particles - came
the science of quantum mechanics. Matter was weighed and measured, the electrical flow calculated, the degree of
intrusion required to cause atoms bound to one another to break apart noted, and all this went into quantum mechanics,
a worthy science. What interferes with the data going into the formulas is mankind's lack of knowledge in general
about subatomic particles and the many types of what they would call energy waves that exist. If one were asked to
compute the amount of water required to turn a water wheel at such a speed and for such a duration, but were not told
that the temperature on occasion would be below freezing or that at other times the water would flood and reverse the
direction of water flow - the computations would invariably be wrong.
Quantum mechanics balances out what it does not know with careful observation, so the formulas are the result of
observed facts and behavior, not theory. In this regard they are accurate, but where the science begins to go amuck is
in the theoretical aspect, where data tied to observed facts is expected to take second place to theories - the facts to
follow the theory. Our advice is to stick to observing, as at least that way you were getting someplace.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s78.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:25 AM]
ZetaTalk: Spin
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Spin
Note: written on Jan 15, 1997.
Spin is a phenomenon that occurs regularly in nature and is frequently observed on Earth, from the large swirls that
hurricanes form to the small tornadoes in the middle of water going down the drain. The fact that such a spin moves in
different directions when it is above or below the equator gives evidence that spin is affected by factors outside of
itself. The phenomenon of spin is observable when the object in motion is not constrained. Air and water are fluid, but
spinning tops or figure skaters on ice also demonstrate the phenomena. The theoretical speed of a spin is fastest toward