the center of the spinning object, a factor easily noted by comparing hurricane wind speeds with those at the center of
tornadoes. But why the difference?
Spin on the surface of the Earth reflects what is occurring in the core of the Earth. If the Earth were not rotating, its
core moving to escape or pull toward other matter in the Solar System and beyond, then spin would be affected only
by the various attractions or repulsion the spinning object itself has to its immediate neighborhood. All objects on the
face of the Earth have these same influences from the core of the Earth, but this is not evident due to lack of fluidity or
lack of motion. Spin in an object develops slowly, and is only evident to man when accumulated. Thus, water in a
water fall has spin, but the water at the bottom of the fall cannot affect the water at the top, so the spin is not
compounded. Water in a drain compounds the spin at the top by affecting the path of least resistance for the water at
the top of the drain, and thus the little tornadoes in draining water.
Spin occurs faster when the spinning object is narrow as there are fewer factors to counter the spin. A large air mass
such as is moving during a hurricane is spread out over a larger area of the core of the Earth, and thus the impetus to
move with the core is countered by the fact that one of the outer edges, the one on the pole side, is lined up over core
parts that are moving slower than the other outer edge, the one on the equator side. Thus small tops can spin faster for
the given impetus than large tops, and figure skaters find they can spin faster by reducing their overall size by drawing
their arms in and hugging themselves.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s86.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:26 AM]
ZetaTalk: Statistical Analysis
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Statistical Analysis
Note: written on Jan 15, 1996.
Humans have a saying, that one can lie with statistics, because numbers can be manipulated to support any argument.
If one wants to demonstrate that the populace is not starving, one adjusts the threshold where starvation sets in. If the
numbers run up on one group don't look so good, pick another group. If the average is too low or high, go for the
median and arrange to discard the high or low end. Statistics, done honestly, can make a statement like no other, but
done dishonestly are deeply deceptive because the readership believes the numbers have been run up honestly.
In an era of increasing distress, governments want the statistics on the homeless, the unemployed, and the uninsured to
appear healthy. Likewise, corporations wishing to lie to consumers or to their stockholders discard the unpleasant from
the computation and hope no one looks too closely. However, they are likewise being increasingly challenged. What
was included? How did you arrive at these figures? The squeeze is on. An easy out in these circumstances is to make
the formulas more complicated. Then the common man can't understand and the factors can be argued endlessly. One
trick is to factor in a null, a zero, as a theoretical possibility, when no such possibility in fact exists. Another trick is to
hop through the data in intervals, taking a summation of spot testing, rather than a summation of all the data. If
hopping through the data with one interval doesn't give the desired results, try another interval. All in a day's work for
the dishonest statistical analyst.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s52.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Time Travel
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Time Travel
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Time travel is a mystery we cannot explain fully to you. This is not dependent on our wishes, or your desire, but on the
rules we must follow. These rules are above the Council of Worlds. These rules are not negotiable. However, we can
give you some sense of what is going on. Beyond this, there is not much we can say until you reach 4th Density.
Time is linear only in your mind. It is not what it seems. Your sense that time is linear in the Universe is supported by
what you observe: clocks running in seeming syncronicity; planetary movements that are predictable; testimony of
other people you interact with to the effect that they, too, observe the same time passage as you do. However, time is
only a factor, and as such when put into mathematical calculations can be affected along with the other factors. The
Universe is such a huge mathematical calculation. In the portion of the world that you live in, the factors are stable
enough that the time factor never varies enough to be noticed. This makes you think that time is a fixed factor. It is not
fixed. We understand what other factors are involved, and how to modify them so that the time factor changes as we
wish.
The issue of time travel is confusing to humans, who see the movies where parties go into the future as well as the
past. Would that not be the case, as if one can go in one direction, why not the other? One cannot travel into the future,
except in small increments, hours at most. Leaping into the future is a fiction. One can travel into the past, as that is a
trail marked in the substance of the Universe, strands that can be unwoven and rewoven, a rope that stretches back
endlessly. The past has markers. Grip points. It has been built, where the future has not yet been built. A phrase much
in use is the Time/Space Continuum. This is simply a way of stating that matter may be in a different place, or space,
depending on the time, and that matter leaves a trail, or continuum, over time. You can equate the Time/Space
Continuum to our term strands, being woven and unwoven, which we consider more exact as it refers to the webbing
that takes place.
What would happen if one went back along a particular strand, unraveling it, and changed the circumstances
surrounding the strand. Would it change the present, and thus the future? Yes, but not to the degree depicted in the
movies, where people wink out like lights and buildings disappear from sight and even from the memory of all. How
could it, as each of these occurrences is composed of numerous strands, weaving in multiple directions, and it is
impossible to change them all. What in fact occurs, should one be allowed to go back in time and make an alteration,
is that the future is essentially unchanged. We say essentially, as there has been change, but due to the interweaving of
other strands, this is muted. The Council of Worlds strictly administers time travel, as should one go back in time and
really work at it, changes would begin to appear.
An example might be a child, born with a genetic defect. Should one go into the strands leading to conception, and
change the DNA strands affecting the defect, the child would be born whole. However, each second that ticks past the
moment of conception complicates this, as the webbing of strands has begun. At three months the fetus has strands of
interplay with the mother's host womb, her blood and DNA makeup, such that simply changing the makeup of the